getall.com getall.com
  Home Page >> About Us >> Place Your Link >> Privacy of Info >> Terms & Conditions >> Add Your Article
Search:   
Multiple links exchange
 
   

Outdoor & Sports

   

Education & Learning

   

Investment & Finance

   

Eating & Drinking

   

Medicine & Treatment

   

News & Events

   

Hotels & Travel

   

Home Family & Garden

   

Shopping & Auction

   

Recreation

   

Business & Commerce

   

Culture & Art

   

Property & Estate

   

Children & Teens

   

People & Society

   

Internet & Computers

   

Technology & Science

   

Government & Politics

   

Indoor Games

   

Fashion & Relationships

   

Automotive

   

Employment & Careers

   

Self Management

   

Hygiene & Health

 

Home Page » News & Events » Political Issues
 

The Balance of Lives

 

George Bush is ready to spend $7.5 billion dollars to protect the US from a disease that currently poses no danger and has so far killed no Americans, and only 62 people worldwide. Meanwhile, Bill Gates, much maligned by the media and internet geeks, is spending over $258 million in research toward Malaria, a disease which kills 1.2 million every year.

Of the $258 million that Mr. Gates is spending, $107 million will go towards accelerating the development of a Malaria vaccine. The added money could lead to the development of a vaccine within 6 years. Experts estimate that a malaria vaccine will cut the number of Malaria deaths in half. In other words, it will save 600,000 lives a year, most of them children.

Bill Gates is quoted in the Washington Post:

Its really a tragedy that the world has done so little to stop this disease that kills 2,000 African children every day, Gates said in a conference call with reporters. If those children were in rich countries, wed have headlines, wed take action, and we wouldnt rest until every child was protected.

Exactly right, Mr. Gates. So why would we spend $7.5 billion to fight a disease that maybe, someday, sorta, could possibly become a pandemic that will, at its worst, do no more damage in total than Malaria does every single year? Why would we not spend a fraction of that money to save 600,000 children every year? Some Liberal pundits would cry racism or classism, but that answer is too simplistic. The real answer is: The Media.

Quite simply, there is a media frenzy around the Bird Flu, and there isnt a media frenzy around Malaria. Even the leaders of the world are susceptible to influence by the media, and they will spend their time, resources, and money fighting perceived threats while ignoring real, but hidden, threats.

So why is the media doing this? why is there more coverage of the Bird Flu, which has only killed 62 people, than there was of the earthquake in Pakistan, which killed tens of thousands? Because panic sells. Alarmism sells. The only thing that sells more media viewing time than a disaster, is a disaster that hasnt happened yet.

There is hope. Eventually, people will tire of hearing about the Bird Flu, and in 6 months you wont hear a peep about it. The Bird Flu will go the way of Anthrax letters, Ebola virus, flesh-eating bacteria, and a host of other medical disasters that never quite managed to manifest.

Author: Terry Connors
 
Author Bio:

Terry Connors

Terry Connors is a Gen-X family guy with 2 step-kids and a loving wife. He frequently blogs about current events, especially if there is a scientific angle to the news items.

All work is copyright, Terry Connors 2005

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
When Teenagers Rule the World
 
Pray Takes In the Whole Person No Double-Minded Person Needs To Apply
 
The In Your Face Gay Marriage Rioters
 
A Component of Liberty is a Strong Social Contract with Governing Body
 
The History of Super Glue
 
Ohio Mosque Promotes Murder!
 
What Is An Angel?
 
Whose Land?
 
Genetically Based Sin
 
Disobedience Caused Earth's Doom
 
 
 
Home Page >> Privacy of Info >> Terms & Conditions  
Copyright © www.getallcontent.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide.